WeaknessesSome criticism of choppy flow and inconsistent inputs or formats at the terminals. The strong tech focus isn’t for everyone, and English story snippets can briefly slow things down.
StrengthsAtmosphere and effects pull you in fast; the scenarios feel well‑thought‑out and high‑quality. The hosting is attentive, and the puzzle detail work is often praised.
SecurityThere’s a clear briefing and guidance on using modern electronics. Due to bright flashing and flicker effects, it’s explicitly not recommended for epilepsy.
Level of fearNo horror—more tension and adrenaline than jump scares. Not suitable for people with epilepsy due to flashes and flicker.
Actors' gameThe game masters are described as very nice and helpful, with hints given in measured doses. Interaction happens mostly through tech rather than acting.
Quality of riddlesClever, partly demanding, but fair and solvable in time. Few classic locks; lots at terminals and with digital logic. Some occasionally miss a clear guide between tasks.
PlotYou investigate an incident in a pharma corporation’s high‑tech unit and gradually uncover what happened. Choices affect the course and bind the team into the story.
Difficulty levelMore medium to tough, with advantages for computer‑savvy teams. A bit of English helps; beginners manage fine with hints.
Reviews